Programma

Sede del convegno

  • Auditorium Mons. Silvano Mantevecchi

    • Auditorium
      Sessioni Parallele, Relazioni ad Invito, Riunione Soci

  • Sede Sant'Angelo Magno

    Planimetria sede

    • Aula A
      Sessioni Parallele
    • Aula B
      Sessioni Parallele
    • Aula C
      Sessioni Parallele
    • Aula D
      Sessioni Parallele
    • Aula E,F
      Pausa Caffè e Pranzo
    • Aula G
      Segreteria

  • Sede dell'Annunziata

    Planimetria sede

    • Aula G
      Seminari Tecnici

  • Collegamento tra le sedi

    Collegamenti tra le sedi

Eventi del convegno

2019-09-16

08:00

  • Registrazione dei partecipanti: Sede Sant’Angelo Magno - Aula G

09:00

  • Saluti istituzionali: Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi

10:00

  • Keynote lecture Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi: 

    Lecturer: John Douglas, University of Strathclyde

    Topic: Seismic hazard

    Title: Capturing epistemic uncertainty in earthquake ground motion models

    Abstract.  Our knowledge of earthquake ground motions of engineering significance varies geographically. The prediction of earthquake shaking in parts of the globe with high seismicity and a long history of observations from dense strong-motion networks, such as coastal California, much of Japan and central Italy, should be associated with lower uncertainty than ground-motion models for use in much of the rest of the world, where moderate and large earthquakes occur infrequently and monitoring networks are sparse or only recently installed. This variation in uncertainty, however, is not often captured in the models currently used for seismic hazard assessments, particularly for national or continental-scale studies. One recent technique for the development of ground-motion models is the so-called "backbone" approach, which becoming increasingly employed to develop ground-motion models for use within probabilistic seismic hazard assessments. This technique provides a relatively simple means of transparently capturing epistemic uncertainties in ground-motion models. One of the principal challenges in applying the backbone approach is its calibration so that the branches of the ground-motion logic tree capture the appropriate level of epistemic uncertainty. This is particularly difficult for regions with limited strong-motion data, which are generally areas of lower seismicity. In this talk I will introduce the backbone approach and discuss methods for calibrate the approach using empirical data and stochastic models.

11:00

  • Pausa caffè: Aule E,F Sant'Angelo Magno

11:30

  • Keynote lecture Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi: 

    Lecturer: Donato Carlea, Presidente del Consiglio Superiore dei LLPP

    Topic: Seismic standards

    Title: Sviluppi e prospettive in ambito normativo: il ruolo del Consiglio Superiore dei Lavori Pubblici

12:30

  • Sessioni Parallele: 

    Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi  : SG07 - Costruzioni in acciaio e miste acciaio calcestruzzo;      

                                                        SG09 - Costruzioni prefabbricate

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula A: SS03-1 Progressi nel campo delle prove dinamiche e del monitoraggio delle strutture

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula B: SG13-1 Miglioramento, adeguamento sismico delle costruzioni

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula C: SS10-1 Tecnologie di monitoraggio sismico per l’identificazione del danno post-terremoto

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula D: SS11-1 La nuova generazione di edifici resilienti a basso danneggiamento

13:15

  • Pausa Pranzo: Aule E,F Sant'Angelo Magno

14:30

  • Keynote lecture Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi: 

    Lecturer: Roberto Paolucci, Politecnico di Milano

    Topic: Seismic hazard

    Title: Seismic hazard and seismic input for design

15:30

  • Sessioni Parallele: 

    Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi  : SS02-1 Incertezze nei sistemi di valutazione di vulnerabilità e del rischio

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula A: SS03-2 Progressi nel campo delle prove dinamiche e del monitoraggio delle strutture

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula B: SG13-2 Miglioramento, adeguamento sismico delle costruzioni

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula C: SS10-2 Tecnologie di monitoraggio sismico per l’identificazione del danno post-terremoto

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula D: SS11-2 La nuova generazione di edifici resilienti a basso danneggiamento

16:45

  • Pausa caffè: Aule E,F Sant'Angelo Magno

17:15

  • Sessioni Parallele: 

    Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi  : SS02-2 Incertezze nei sistemi di valutazione di vulnerabilità e del rischio

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula A: SS07-1 Stima delle perdite e analisi dei costi di ricostruzione post sisma

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula B: SG13-3 Miglioramento, adeguamento sismico delle costruzioni

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula C: SS10-3 Tecnologie di monitoraggio sismico per l’identificazione del danno post-terremoto

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula D: SS08 Modellazione di strutture murarie rinforzate con FRP-FRCM

18:30

  • Chiusura del primo giorno del Convegno

2019-09-17

08:00

  • Registrazione dei partecipanti: Sede Sant’Angelo Magno - Aula G

09:00

  • Keynote lecture Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi: 

    Lecturer: Gian Michele Calvi, UME School IUSS Pavia

    Topic: Earthquake Resistant Design

    Title: Re-Visiting Earthquake Resistant Design

    Abstract. Earthquake have caused thousands of casualties and €billions of losses. As a reaction, the earthquake engineering community has developed approaches to predict the response of bare structures (as opposite to complete constructions) and codes of practice considering a single “life safety” performance objective, assumed to be associated with the structural collapse prevention. Recently, the perception of different performance levels’ pertinence on total losses following an earthquake has become increasingly relevant and numerous developments on the convolution of hazard-vulnerability-exposure-risk followed to give a framework to quantify and manage seismic risk. However, most developments have tried to correct old approaches, based on questionable assumptions, failing to produce consistent and effective procedures. This lecture aims to re-discuss the challenges induced by seismic demand to constructed environment, focusing on the following main topics:

    a) A rational definition of earthquake action demand. As many assumptions on ground motion demands are based on few records from over 50 years ago, it seems logical to consider the plethora of digital records today available.

    b) A re-visitation of the connections between construction response parameters during earthquakes and resulting global losses by considering damage to both structural and non-structural elements, effects of down time, loss of competitiveness and societal impact.

    c) A consequent revision of seismic design philosophy and methods using the above two point’s outputs. In the past, these moved from a strength–acceleration comparison, followed by a ductility demand–capacity check, to displacement–based approaches. A simpler and clearer approach to mitigate economic impact and protect lives during seismic events.

10:00

  • Keynote lecture Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi: 

    Lecturer: Anastasios Sextos, University of Bristol

    Topic: Bridge risk assessment

    Title: Seismic risk and resilience assessment of roadway networks in earthquake prone areas

    Abstract. Quantifying the resilience of road networks, defined as their ability to withstand, adapt to, and rapidly recover after a disruptive event, is a challenging issue of paramount importance towards holistic disaster risk mitigation and management. This talk aims to present a comprehensive, multi-criterion framework for mitigating the overall loss expected to be experienced by the community due to future earthquake events. The latter is decoupled into the direct structural damage-related loss and the indirect loss associated with the travel delays of the network users, as well as the wider socio-economic consequences in the affected area. In order to reflect the multi-dimensional nature of loss, a set of novel, time-variant indicators is herein introduced, while cumulative indicators are proposed for assessing the total loss incurred throughout the entire recovery period. This probabilistic risk management framework is implemented into a software to facilitate informed decisions of the stakeholders, both before and after a major earthquake event, thus prioritizing the pre-disruption strengthening schemes and accelerating the inspection and recovery measures, respectively.

11:00

  • Pausa caffè: Aule E,F Sant'Angelo Magno

11:30

  • Sessioni Parallele: 

    Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi  : SG10 Materiali tradizionali ed innovativi

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula A: SS07-2 Stima delle perdite e analisi dei costi di ricostruzione post sisma

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula B: SG13-4 Miglioramento, adeguamento sismico delle costruzioni

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula C: SS06 Interazione terreno struttura nei problemi di modellazione e progettazione di infrastrutture

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula D: SS09-1 Sviluppi nell’impiego di OpenSees per l’ingegneria sismica

13:15

  • Pausa Pranzo: Aule E,F Sant'Angelo Magno

14:30

  • Keynote lecture Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi: 

    Lecturer: Franco Braga, Presidente ANIDIS

    Topic: Bridge risk assessment

    Title: Il rischio sismico dei ponti in Italia

15:30

  • Sessioni Parallele: 

    Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi  : SG03-1 Vulnerabilità e rischio sismico

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula A: SS01-1 Affidabilità dei sistemi di protezione sismica basati su isolamento e dissipazione

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula B: SG13-5 Miglioramento, adeguamento sismico delle costruzioni

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula C: SS13-1 Valutazioni di vulnerabilità a larga scala delle scuole e altri edifici strategici o rilevanti

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula D: SS09-2 Sviluppi nell’impiego di OpenSees per l’ingegneria sismica

16:45

  • Pausa caffè: Aule E,F Sant'Angelo Magno

17:15

  • Sessioni Parallele: 

    Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi  : SG03-2 Vulnerabilità e rischio sismico

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula A: SS01-2 Affidabilità dei sistemi di protezione sismica basati su isolamento e dissipazione

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula B: SG05-1 Costruzioni in cemento armato

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula C: SS13-2 Valutazioni di vulnerabilità a larga scala delle scuole e altri edifici strategici o rilevanti

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula D: SS04 Ricerca industriale sulla prestazione sismica degli elementi non struttura

18:30

  • Chiusura del secondo giorno del Convegno

2019-09-18

08:00

  • Registrazione dei partecipanti: Sede Sant’Angelo Magno - Aula G

09:00

  • Keynote lecture Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi: 

    Lecturer: André Plumier, Univerité de Liège

    Topic: EC8 advancements

    Title: Advancement in the revision of Eurocode 8 rules for new buildings: an overview

    Abstract. The existing Eurocode 8 is a robust code but, after more than 15 years of use, there were justified requests for revision. The work is under way and the final draft for the design of new buildings will be ready in 2020. In this document, some improvements, like the extension of the applicability of elastic design to zones of greater seismicity, the introduction of a "light" ductility class and the revision of effective width of slab, respond to a general CEN wish for a greater ease of use. Some other modifications result from the extension of knowledge on systems covered incompletely or not at all in the existing edition of EC8: isolators, dampers, BRB's, lightweight steel structures, timber structures, masonry infills, aluminium structures. Pushover analysis is now pratically applicable as data for modelling of dissipative zones are explicit in the code. Some difficulties which appeared in the revision process will be explained.

10:00

  • Sessioni Parallele: 

    Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi  : SG03-3 Vulnerabilità e rischio sismico

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula A: SS01-3 Affidabilità dei sistemi di protezione sismica basati su isolamento e dissipazione

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula B: SG05-2 Costruzioni in cemento armato

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula C: SS13-3 Valutazioni di vulnerabilità a larga scala delle scuole e altri edifici strategici o rilevanti

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula D: SS05-1 Valutazione di strutture strategiche: ponti e viadotti

11:00

  • Pausa caffè: Aule E,F Sant'Angelo Magno

11:30

  • Sessioni Parallele: 

    Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi  : SG03-4 Vulnerabilità e rischio sismico

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula A: SS01-4 Affidabilità dei sistemi di protezione sismica basati su isolamento e dissipazione

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula B: SG05-3 Costruzioni in cemento armato

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula C: SG08 Costruzioni in legno

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula D: SS05-2 Valutazione di strutture strategiche: ponti e viadotti

13:15

  • Pausa Pranzo: Aule E,F Sant'Angelo Magno

14:30

  • Keynote lecture Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi: 

    Lecturer: Sergio Lagomarsino, Università di Genova

    Topic: EC8 advancements

    Title: Valutazione della risposta sismica del costruito storico: criticità e prospettive

15:30

  • Sopralluogo Tecnico - Camerino
  • Sessioni Parallele: 

    Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi  : SG03-5 Vulnerabilità e rischio sismico

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula A: SG06-1 Costruzioni in muratura e muratura armata

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula B: SG05-4 Costruzioni in cemento armato

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula C: SS12 Metodologie per la valutazione del rischio sismico e della resilienza degli impianti industriali

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula D: SG11 Ponti, infrastrutture, reti tecniche ed impianti

16:45

  • Pausa caffè: Aule E,F Sant'Angelo Magno

17:15

  • Keynote lecture Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi

18:30

  • Chiusura del terzo giorno del Convegno

2019-09-19

08:00

  • Registrazione dei partecipanti: Sede Sant’Angelo Magno - Aula G

09:00

  • Keynote lecture Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi: 

    Lecturer: Maria Gabriella Castellano, FIP mec srl

    Topic: Damage reduction in non-structural components

    Title: 40 years of seismic isolation in Italy: from bridges to buildings and art objects

    Abstract. Seismic isolation in Italy started in viaducts in the seventies and for the first two decades most Italian isolated structures were bridges and viaducts. Seismically isolated buildings were quite few in Italy until 2003, when the new standard (OPCM 3274) following the tragedy of 2002 San Giuliano's earthquake removed the need of approval from the Board of Public Works for projects of seismically isolated structures and introduced specific chapters on their design. The use of seismic isolation increased after 2009 L'Aquila earthquake, both in bridges and in buildings. In new buildings, seismic isolation started to be used not only in strategic buildings, such as hospitals or schools, but in residential buildings as well. Retrofit of existing buildings with seismic isolation was carried out in many cases, mostly in reinforced concrete buildings but also in some masonry buildings, but most of such interventions are in buildings damaged by the earthquake and declared unusable. Unfortunately, the potentiality of seismic isolation together with the tax deductions offered by the Italian State for seismic retrofit interventions on existing buildings (SISMABONUS) is not yet fully understood by the majority of professionals.

    Amongst the well known advantages of seismic isolation, one of the most important for buildings is its ability to reduce damage in non-structural components, thanks to the reduction of the acceleration transmitted to the superstructure, as well as the reduction of the amplification of said acceleration along the building's height. The damage in the partitions is reduced thanks to the strong reduction in the interstorey drift, and the low acceleration reduces damage in the building's content as well, guaranteing full functionality after strong earthquake. These are the reasons why seismic isolation was initially used in strategic buildings, in particular hospitals. However, recent earthquakes have demonstrated that the damage in recent buildings is mainly concentrated in non-structural components, and thus the enormous social and economical costs of an earthquake could be strongly reduced if seismic isolation is widely used both in new buildings and in existing buildings. In this talk I will show examples of use of seismic isolation in both new and existing building, with focus on seismic isolation systems that are more effective in the reduction of damage in non-structural components.

    When seismic isolation of the entire building is not possible, the most precious or sensitive objects can be protected through seismic isolation. For example, art objects in museums, or servers in data centers. An introduction to the isolation systems for objects will be given.

10:00

  • Sessioni Parallele: 

    Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi  : SG03-6 Vulnerabilità e rischio sismico

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula A: SG06-2 Costruzioni in muratura e muratura armata

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula B: SG14-1 Protezione passiva, semi-attiva e attiva di strutture ed impianti

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula C: SG12-1 Sperimentazione, diagnostica e monitoraggio di strutture ed infrastrutture

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula D: SG04 Criteri e metodi di progetto ed analisi strutturale

11:00

  • Pausa caffè: Aule E,F Sant'Angelo Magno

11:30

  • Sessioni Parallele: 

    Auditorium Mons. Montevecchi  : SG03-7 Vulnerabilità e rischio sismico

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula A: SG06-3 Costruzioni in muratura e muratura armata

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula B: SG14-2 Protezione passiva, semi-attiva e attiva di strutture ed impianti

    Sede Sant’Angelo Magno Aula C: SG12-2 Sperimentazione, diagnostica e monitoraggio di strutture ed infrastrutture

13:15

  • Pausa Pranzo: Aule E,F Sant'Angelo Magno

14:30

  • Chiusura del Convegno